The Health Engine — the answer about his own body, on his phone

Nick asks a hard question about his own body from his phone and gets a complete, sourced answer out of his whole dated record — a plain fact back in a moment, an explanation in seconds, a recommendation checked against his own record — with his trial history cited, his felt state ahead of any number, and his six hard flags holding.

As of September 10, 08:17 PM
What the status words mean proven · done, not independently checked · partly done · not started · blocked · parked
92%done, not independently checked

11 steps: 9 proven · 2 partly done · 0 untouched · 0 blocked · 0 parked

agent runs · not recordedtokens used · not recordedreview notes · not recordeddollars charged · not recorded

The plan as first written

Nick asks a hard question about his own body from his phone and gets a complete, sourced answer out of his whole dated record — a plain fact back in a moment, an explanation in seconds, a recommendation checked against his own record — with his trial history cited, his felt state ahead of any number, and his six hard flags holding.

Steps

IdPlain wordsPercentStateProofWhat is left
STEP 1Release the engine he ordered released100% provenThe exerciser's five-part release proof, all run from the lane's working copy at /Users/nickdeck/Documents/health-lane-wt on branch health/lane — (a) bash projects/personal/skippy-app/fly-deploy/bundle.sh then node projects/ops/skippy-jobs/jobs/engine-image-freshness.mjs produce a real receipt with a release_id d4c:<64 hex>, a code_revision git:<40 hex>+tree:<64 hex> and the corpus sha; (b) python3 projects/personal/health/engine/qa-battery/a11_release.py --selftest prints passed true, proving the release gate's own code is intact and untouched; (c) python3 projects/personal/health/engine/test_hard_flags_universal.py prints 175/175 checks PASS and python3 projects/personal/health/engine/gate/test_guard_boundary.py prints 41/41 passed on that same candidate; (d) the serving revision read back from GET /api/v1/engine-build-receipt equals the bundle's code_revision; (e) evidence/health-step1-release.json carries the bundle digest, the receipt, both accepted defects by case id (U04 and U15), Nick's waiver in his own words with its date, and the line 'release gate campaign (39 receipts + sealed exam): NOT RUN — cut by programme §3c; gate code untouched, selftest PASS'. The release gate's 39-receipt campaign is NOT RUN this round and no line here claims a gate verdict; --redesign-check release belongs to STEP 7 aloneThe step
STEP 2Put this lane's record on the cloud main line100% provenGit -C "/Users/nickdeck/Documents/Claude 2.0" ls-tree -r --name-only origin/main -- projects/ops/life-os/audits/A11 | wc -l prints above 100 on the REMOTE where it prints 0 today, and the safety-suite difference between the two copies is recorded for STEP 4 (which alone reconciles it) without a byte of it changed here; and git diff --name-only origin/main origin/preserve/life-os-wt-uncommitted-20260909 -- projects/personal/health/engine lists only the four frozen files, the Brains lane's brain-routing folder, the two log/data files and the stray nested qa-battery/projects path, plus a MERGED file only when its diff against the lane copy equals main's own pre-landing change exactly — the candidate engine's other 30 files are on main, merged three-way where both sides changed; git fetch origin main runs first so the remote read is currentThe step
STEP 3The three answer shapes, at the cost he agreed100% provenMeasured through the engine's TRUE entry point, skippy_answer.skippy_answer(question, who="nick") at skippy_answer.py line 595 (decorated @answer_timing.trace_request at 594), which returns the ServiceResult dataclass at lines 207-232 — never answer_engine.answer() at answer_engine.py line 2565, which is the FAST path with no verifier and is not what Nick's phone route calls. One SUBPROCESS PER ENGINE COPY, because two copies carry the same module names and cannot be imported into one process: candidate /Users/nickdeck/Documents/health-lane-wt, baseline /Users/nickdeck/Documents/health-baseline-wt at commit bc02ba80c5336a66ed4ab16daa2f9e8ff5243131, each exchanging JSON on stdout, each run with SKIPPY_LANE=claude-cli and SKIPPY_RUN_CONTEXT=eval (both required — the real transport, projects/shared-tooling/py/lane.py, raises CliLaneRefusal at lines 1191-1197 unless the run context is one of _CLI_OK_CONTEXTS at line 212) and HEALTH_ENGINE_GRUNT_STRAIGHT_LINE=0 so no call reaches a cheap outside vendor. THE COMMAND: SKIPPY_LANE=claude-cli SKIPPY_RUN_CONTEXT=eval HEALTH_ENGINE_GRUNT_STRAIGHT_LINE=0 SKIPPY_CLI_MAX_PROMPT_CHARS=2000000 python3 <the lane's shapes reader, harness/shapes-check.py, CREATED BY STEP 3> --candidate /Users/nickdeck/Documents/health-lane-wt --baseline /Users/nickdeck/Documents/health-baseline-wt --lookup "what was my last HRV reading" --explanation "what does my ferritin trend mean" --recommendation "should I restart the thyroid protocol" --ambiguous "/Users/nickdeck/Documents/Claude 2.0/projects/ops/life-os/REGROUP-2026-09-08/plans/HEALTH/evidence/health-step3-ambiguous-questions.json" --out "/Users/nickdeck/Documents/Claude 2.0/projects/ops/life-os/REGROUP-2026-09-08/plans/HEALTH/evidence/health-step3-shapes.json" prints one line "mode": "shapes", "ok": true, "failures": [] with exit 0, and the evidence file it writes, evidence/health-step3-shapes.json, carries nine controls each with "ok": true — LOOKUP_ZERO_CALLS, LOOKUP_UNDER_1000MS, EXPLANATION_ONE_CALL, RECOMMENDATION_ONE_SYNTHESIS_PLUS_ONE_VERIFIER_PASS, DATED_FACTS_FIRST_EVERY_ANSWER, NO_FACT_LOST_VS_EARLIER_ANSWER, SLOWEST_SINGLE_MODEL_CALL_RECORDED, ESCALATIONS_COUNTED and MODEL_SERVED_IS_ANTHROPIC_EVERY_CALL — plus the three candidate and three baseline answers (shape, model_calls, call_roles, route, status, timing stages, text, source_refs), both roots' commits from git -C <root> rev-parse HEAD, the transport served per call, the verifier's per-claim call count as a number, and the line "pilot mode: NOT RUN — its three frozen cases are all recommendations (cases.json 49, 94, 121) and its validation needs the blind grades programme §3c cut". THE BUDGET, HONESTLY: a lookup makes zero model calls, an explanation exactly one synthesis call, and a recommendation one synthesis call plus ONE PASS of the existing fresh-context verifier at harness.py lines 252-270, whose loop at line 257 makes one call PER CLAIM and whose file is pinned (perimeter.sha256 line 11) — so exactly two calls is unreachable without changing a frozen file, which anti-scope (c) forbids and this round does not do; the per-claim count is recorded as a number instead. Every millisecond is read from result.timing['stages'], which exists only because trace_request decorates that entry point — answer_timing.measure() is a no-op outside it (answer_timing.py lines 236-254). This step builds no pilot-config.json and reads no receipts from any other step; the pilot mode is recorded as NOT RUN. ROUTE PROVENANCE (ninth read): on the DEEP route the three new fields and the per-claim N are derived from the lane-log rows observed inside the call window, never from len(claims); the baseline copy at bc02ba80c5 has no answer_timing.py and none of the three fields, so the reader records null for them and no control reads them from the baseline; the reader appends BASELINE_NOT_BC02BA80C5, MODEL_SERVED_NOT_ANTHROPIC or CLASSIFY_SHAPE_ABSENT to its failures list itself.The step
STEP 4The one marker correction he approved100% provenPython3 projects/personal/health/engine/test_hard_flags_universal.py prints 175/175 checks PASS and exits 0, python3 projects/personal/health/engine/gate/test_guard_boundary.py prints 41/41 passed and exits 0, all 169 alias spellings remain, the failing claim was observed rejected before the change and accepted after, and the checker's own independent perimeter enumeration shows exactly three changed files (the gate and the two reconciled safety suites), from the main checkout after the reconciliationThe step
STEP 5Every claim carries its own pointer, and no required fact is dropped100% provenPython3 projects/personal/health/engine/qa-battery/a11_local.py --redesign-check claims --out projects/ops/life-os/audits/A11/LIVE/REDESIGN/plan-2026-09-09/claims-<UTC stamp> prints the one line "mode": "claims", "ok": true, "failures": [] with exit 0, and the copied evidence file carries EVERY_CLAIM_EXACT_POINTER, REQUIRED_FACTS_MISSING_0 and NO_UNCITED_SUPPORT each with "ok": true. The runner refuses an --out that is not scratch or under projects/ops/life-os/audits/A11/LIVE and refuses a folder that already exists, so every run is its own stamped folder and the step copies its redesign-check-claims.json into evidence/health-step5-pointers.json beside the plan, which is the file the checker reads. Each control named here is added as a {"control": "<NAME>", "ok": <bool>} entry to the controls list inside the claims branch of redesign_check in a11_local.py, with CONTROL_DID_NOT_BEHAVE:<NAME> appended to failures when it is false — a name in MODE_REQUIRED_ASSERTIONS alone checks nothing, because that dictionary holds plain strings the runner never evaluates.The step
STEP 6The two defects both readers agreed on, made impossible100% provenPython3 projects/personal/health/engine/qa-battery/a11_local.py --redesign-check claims --out projects/ops/life-os/audits/A11/LIVE/REDESIGN/plan-2026-09-09/claims-<UTC stamp> prints the one line "mode": "claims", "ok": true, "failures": [] with exit 0, and the copied evidence file carries CERTAINTY_CONTROL_RED_THEN_GREEN, IDENTITY_CONTROL_RED_THEN_GREEN and OTHER_PERSON_MATERIAL_0 each with "ok": true, each control observed failing on the unfixed engine first on the case that produced it — U04 for certainty, U15 for identity — and STEP 5's three controls re-asserted and green in this step's own evidence file rather than read out of STEP 5's run folder. The runner refuses an --out that is not scratch or under projects/ops/life-os/audits/A11/LIVE and refuses a folder that already exists, so every run is its own stamped folder and the step copies its redesign-check-claims.json into evidence/health-step6-defects.json beside the plan, which is the file the checker reads. Each control named here is added as a {"control": "<NAME>", "ok": <bool>} entry to the controls list inside the claims branch of redesign_check in a11_local.py, with CONTROL_DID_NOT_BEHAVE:<NAME> appended to failures when it is false — a name in MODE_REQUIRED_ASSERTIONS alone checks nothing, because that dictionary holds plain strings the runner never evaluates.The step
STEP 7On his phone and in the voice app, under twenty seconds90% done, not independently checkedProjects/ops/life-os/audits/A11/LIVE/REDESIGN/step-9/release-config.json exists and is accepted by the runner (without it the run stops at RELEASE_CONFIG_ABSENT), and python3 projects/personal/health/engine/qa-battery/a11_local.py --redesign-check release --out projects/ops/life-os/audits/A11/LIVE/REDESIGN/plan-2026-09-09/release-<UTC stamp> prints "mode": "release" with a failures list holding ONLY the RELEASE_VERIFY_ and RELEASE_COMPARE_ entries that trace to the 39-receipt campaign and sealed exam the programme plan cut in its §3c — so ok reads false for that reason alone and NO "ok": true is promised from this mode this round — while the copied evidence file carries EIGHT_OF_EIGHT_COMPLETE, MEASURED_MS_MAX_UNDER_20000, COMPLETE_UNDER_20000MS_RECOMPUTED_FROM_MEASURED_MS, HARD_FLAG_SCAN_ALL_EIGHT_PASS, NEW_HEALTH_FACTS_0 and RELEASE_RECEIPT_CAMPAIGN_NOT_RUN_RECORDED each with "ok": true, no CONTROL_DID_NOT_BEHAVE: entry anywhere in that list, three typed, three spoken and two at once over Nick's own authenticated route, and each answer read back from the client itself rather than from a send receipt. real_route.measured_ms holds eight MEASURED millisecond numbers — typed requests from the accepted request to the last visible character, spoken ones from the end of the utterance to the last audible sample — and this step extends _release_mode to assert max(measured_ms) < 20000 AND to recompute complete_under_20000ms from that list rather than reading the typed boolean. The same evidence records 'release gate campaign (39 receipts + sealed exam): NOT RUN — cut by programme §3c; gate code untouched, selftest PASS'. The runner refuses an --out that is not scratch or under projects/ops/life-os/audits/A11/LIVE and refuses a folder that already exists, so every run is its own stamped folder and the step copies its redesign-check-release.json into evidence/health-step7-delivery.json beside the plan, which is the file the checker reads. Each control named here is added as a {"control": "<NAME>", "ok": <bool>} entry to the controls list inside the release branch of redesign_check in a11_local.py, with CONTROL_DID_NOT_BEHAVE:<NAME> appended to failures when it is false — a name in MODE_REQUIRED_ASSERTIONS alone checks nothing, because that dictionary holds plain strings the runner never evaluates.The step
STEP 8The runner can safely run two requests at once100% provenPython3 projects/personal/health/engine/qa-battery/a11_local.py --redesign-check instruments --out projects/ops/life-os/audits/A11/LIVE/REDESIGN/plan-2026-09-09/instruments-<UTC stamp> prints the one line "mode": "instruments", "ok": true, "failures": [] with exit 0, and the copied evidence file carries OVERLAPPING_EVIDENCE_COLLISIONS_0 and SHARED_PERMISSION_WINDOWS_0 each with "ok": true, with the same overlapping control observed failing on the unfixed runner first and no model call and no network reached by it. The runner refuses an --out that is not scratch or under projects/ops/life-os/audits/A11/LIVE and refuses a folder that already exists, so every run is its own stamped folder and the step copies its redesign-check-instruments.json into evidence/health-step8-concurrency.json beside the plan, which is the file the checker reads. Each control named here is added as a {"control": "<NAME>", "ok": <bool>} entry to the controls list inside the instruments branch of redesign_check in a11_local.py, with CONTROL_DID_NOT_BEHAVE:<NAME> appended to failures when it is false — a name in MODE_REQUIRED_ASSERTIONS alone checks nothing, because that dictionary holds plain strings the runner never evaluates.The step
STEP 9Coverage and the safety suites still read their pinned counts100% provenPython3 projects/personal/health/engine/qa-battery/a11_local.py --redesign-check coverage --out projects/ops/life-os/audits/A11/LIVE/REDESIGN/plan-2026-09-09/coverage-<UTC stamp> prints the one line "mode": "coverage", "ok": true, "failures": [] with exit 0, and the copied evidence file carries SOURCE_KEY_318_OF_318 and REFERENCE_FAILURES_0 each with "ok": true; python3 projects/personal/health/engine/test_hard_flags_universal.py prints 175/175 checks PASS and exits 0 and python3 projects/personal/health/engine/gate/test_guard_boundary.py prints 41/41 passed and exits 0; the existing Chantelle health surface still returns and still refuses an unknown asker; and the copy of the engine each number came from is recorded. The runner refuses an --out that is not scratch or under projects/ops/life-os/audits/A11/LIVE and refuses a folder that already exists, so every run is its own stamped folder and the step copies its redesign-check-coverage.json into evidence/health-step9-pinned-counts.json beside the plan, which is the file the checker reads. Each control named here is added as a {"control": "<NAME>", "ok": <bool>} entry to the controls list inside the coverage branch of redesign_check in a11_local.py, with CONTROL_DID_NOT_BEHAVE:<NAME> appended to failures when it is false — a name in MODE_REQUIRED_ASSERTIONS alone checks nothing, because that dictionary holds plain strings the runner never evaluates.The step
STEP 10Close-out20% partly donePython3 projects/ops/agents/check_plan.py --gate-progress projects/ops/life-os/REGROUP-2026-09-08/plans/HEALTH/PLAN.proposed.txt exits 0 with every step's evidence complete (never --progress, which always exits 0), the finish line's nine items each point at a closed step's dated verified line, the postmortem is written into the plan, and every leftover on the Mac is declared with its size and removed only where a verified cloud copy existsThe step
STEP 11You ask the same hard question about your body twice and get the same complete, sourced answer both times100% provenFor n in 1 2 3 4 5 6; do SKIPPY_LANE=claude-cli SKIPPY_RUN_CONTEXT=battery HEALTH_ENGINE_GRUNT_STRAIGHT_LINE=0 SKIPPY_CLI_MAX_PROMPT_CHARS=2000000 python3 projects/personal/health/engine/qa-battery/a11_local.py --redesign-check claims --out projects/ops/life-os/audits/A11/LIVE/REDESIGN/plan-2026-09-09/claims-<UTC stamp>; done → each run prints "mode": "claims" with "ok": true, "failures": [], status answered, verifier_ran true, complete true; test_hard_flags_universal.py 175 of 175; the boundary suite 41 of 41; protected-blocks-check.py --quiet reads 34 match, 0 mismatchThe step

Done

9 of 11 steps proven

Left

2 of 11 steps not yet proven

Blocked on

  • Nothing currently blocked.

Formal remaining plan

#StepNeeds Nick
1On his phone and in the voice app, under twenty secondsNo
2Close-outNo

Decisions this lane is waiting on

  1. None.