VISUALS: pictures in and out of the family app and the business workspace

Updated just now.

16% overall1 of 10 steps finished
  1. The brain sees an image0%
    How we know

    Definition of done: a chat turn carrying a valid attachment is answered with a sentence naming something visible only in the image; a refused type is a 400 naming the type and the allowed list; no pending-memory row is written for either turn

    Proof: the relevant item then the evidence re-runner over evidence/step1.txt

    Verified: REGROUP 2026-09-14 · FAILED — CORRECTED BY A COLD READER, and the correction verified. The named proof script does not exist, but this lane's own evidence file records a live test that RAN and came back with the word FAIL. A completed test that failed is FAILED, not 'never achieved'. Evidence: evidence/step1-the relevant record line 29, and the relevant record

  2. Both chat proxies carry the attachment100%
    How we know

    Definition of done: the attachment field survives both proxies byte for byte, and a non-string message content is still refused exactly as before

    Proof: the relevant item

    Verified: REGROUP 2026-09-14 · PROVEN — the attachment count is non-zero in BOTH chat proxy files and is backed by real matching code, not a stray comment. Re-run first-hand, evidence in the relevant record

  3. The family app's Talk tab can attach UI60%

    ⚠️ only 1 of 2 required verifications recorded so far

    How we know

    Definition of done: an agent signed in as Nick drives the real control, attaches a screenshot, gets an answer naming something visible only in the picture, reloads, and the picture is still there

    Proof: the relevant item

    Verified: REGROUP 2026-09-14 · PARTLY PROVEN — CORRECTED BY A COLD READER, and the correction verified by opening the evidence. The attach control on the family app's Talk tab IS BUILT AND CONFIRMED LIVE: this lane's own evidence records it rendering, wiring up, uploading through the existing route, carrying the attachment on send, and refusing anything over 5MB. What cannot pass is the step's FULL bar — an answer naming something visible only in the picture — because that depends on step 1, which failed. The earlier verdict of 'artefact gone' was markedly harsher than the evidence on file. Evidence: evidence/step3-the relevant record, and the relevant record

  4. The business workspace's Talk panel can attach UI0%
    How we know

    Definition of done: the same drive on the live business workspace as a real team member, and the same upload refused when called with no session

    Proof: the relevant item

    Verified: REGROUP 2026-09-14 · UNPROVEN: ARTEFACT GONE — the named drive script evidence/step4-the relevant record exists nowhere on disk. Re-run first-hand, evidence in the relevant record

  5. The brain returns a visual, on a recorded road0%
    How we know

    Definition of done: the road decision with four numbers per road is written into this plan, one road is built, and a money answer carries a visual whose every figure appears in the same turn's gateway result

    Proof: the relevant item then the evidence re-runner over evidence/step5.txt

    Verified: REGROUP 2026-09-14 · UNPROVEN: ARTEFACT GONE — no script, and this plan itself records no road decision, which its own definition of done requires. Re-run first-hand, evidence in the relevant record

  6. Both apps render a returned visual UI0%
    How we know

    Definition of done: the visual draws inside the turn on both live surfaces, is legible at 390 by 844 with no sideways page scroll, and survives a full reload

    Proof: the relevant item

    Verified: REGROUP 2026-09-14 · UNPROVEN: ARTEFACT GONE — the named drive script evidence/step6-the relevant record exists nowhere on disk. Re-run first-hand, evidence in the relevant record

  7. The upload says which store served it, and the bucket item goes to Nick0%
    How we know

    Definition of done: each upload answers with a store name, every field the to-do threads read is unchanged, and the file reads back whichever store served it

    Proof: the relevant item

    Verified: REGROUP 2026-09-14 · UNPROVEN: ARTEFACT GONE — the named probe script evidence/step7-where.sh exists nowhere on disk. Re-run first-hand, evidence in the relevant record

  8. The two changed screens measure zero UI0%
    How we know

    Definition of done: mismatched properties 0 and unmeasured anchors 0 at both viewports on the Talk screen's anchors plus the two new ones, then one grade from Sienna

    Proof: the relevant item

    Verified: REGROUP 2026-09-14 · UNPROVEN: NOT MEASURED — the fidelity instrument itself is sound (its selftest and its sabotage mode both behave correctly), but no real measured run has ever completed; the run hung past 60 seconds and the step is gated behind unclosed steps 3, 4 and 6. Re-run first-hand, evidence in the relevant record

  9. The FINISH LINE signed off by an agent that built none of it0%
    How we know

    Definition of done: all six finish-line items pass, driven first-hand by a session that built nothing in this lane

    Proof: the relevant item

    Verified: REGROUP 2026-09-14 · UNPROVEN: ARTEFACT GONE — the plan-structure gate passes, but the actual six-item finish-line sign-off was never produced, and that is what this step's definition of done asks for. Re-run first-hand, evidence in the relevant record

  10. Postmortem appended to the registry0%
    How we know

    Definition of done: this lane's rows are in the registry's four-column format, or one honest line saying nothing was worth extracting, and the SUMMARY reads as current

    Proof: the relevant item

    Verified: REGROUP 2026-09-14 · FAILED — the registry search for this lane's name returns zero, which is exactly the stated failure condition. Re-run first-hand, evidence in the relevant record